From the Perspectives of Ecological Marxism to Study the Plights of Non-anthropocentrism

Environmental problems have triggered non-anthropocentrism's question to anthropocentrism.

Through the analysis of anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism drawback,the article discusses the concept and intension of sustainable development environment ethics.

The paper introduces various schools of non-human centralism and comments on them briefly aiming to clarify knowledge.

This paper gives a penetrating analysis of the two main branches of modern western environment ethics,namely,human centralism and non-human centralism,and it also constructively examines the several major theories of non-human centralism from the perspective of post-modernization dimensions,discloses the theory value and practical significance of the several dominating thoughts.

Heidegger is thought to be of anti-anthropocentrism, but what he really opposed is to show off new terms, to think of humanbeing as a subject of existence who could dominate and change existence arbitrarily, as well as the thi.

The contention on anthropocentrism and non anthropocentrism is a focal point of environmental ethics and both have its rationalities and limits.

Though the values of the traditional anthropocentrism can t suit the development of contemporary society,non anthropocentrism does not find the right value theory to solve the crises.

According to nonhuman-centered ecological ethics,all creatures in nature,like human race,possess subjectivity and their inner value,right and integrity.