On Modern Anthropocentrism and Human Centralism;

This article attempts to get a clearer idea of how does the ecological civilization inherit and transcend human centralism focusing the relationship between man and nature,and further puts forward the realistic pathway to realize the harmoniou development between man and nature.

The arising of human centralism is the result that man conquers and remoulds the nature,and it reveals the contradiction of man and nature.

From the Perspectives of Ecological Marxism to Study the Plights of Non-anthropocentrism

Environmental problems have triggered non-anthropocentrism's question to anthropocentrism.

Through the analysis of anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism drawback,the article discusses the concept and intension of sustainable development environment ethics.

In the traditional opinion, we consider everything from the point of humanism, however, there is disadvantage of lagging about the traditional profit that the law want to protect.

The discussion about the direction to the basic value of Economic Law almost covers a fact,which means,more or less,considering everything from the point of humanism.

With the development of ethnics in which the focus switches from traditional humanism to ecologism, the problems as to animals rights and status in legal relation arose and need to be solved.

Explanation and ethics-critique of disaster:self-examination and modification about anthropocentrism;

The right comprehension of anthropocentrism;

On the Recent Domestic Research Concerning Anthropocentrism;

The paper introduces various schools of non-human centralism and comments on them briefly aiming to clarify knowledge.

This paper gives a penetrating analysis of the two main branches of modern western environment ethics,namely,human centralism and non-human centralism,and it also constructively examines the several major theories of non-human centralism from the perspective of post-modernization dimensions,discloses the theory value and practical significance of the several dominating thoughts.

The paper points that the difference of modern dialectal human-centralism from ancient universe human-centralism and medieval human theological human-centralism lies in that dialectal human-centralism take the scientific understanding of Marxism about the relations between man and the nature as the thinking foundation and it is a conditional relative human-centralism.

The inner theoretical base for the formation of environmental ethics is the integrative world-view and integrative thinking instead of human-centralism or the inner value and right of nature.

There are a lot of different attitudes towards the comprehension of the human-centralism.