Anthropocentric doctrine conception of nature runs through theme in American and natural relation among natural USA exploitation process the modern times, conquering nature, making use of nature becoming modern times naturally.

From the Perspectives of Ecological Marxism to Study the Plights of Non-anthropocentrism

Environmental problems have triggered non-anthropocentrism's question to anthropocentrism.

Through the analysis of anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism drawback,the article discusses the concept and intension of sustainable development environment ethics.

The paper introduces various schools of non-human centralism and comments on them briefly aiming to clarify knowledge.

This paper gives a penetrating analysis of the two main branches of modern western environment ethics,namely,human centralism and non-human centralism,and it also constructively examines the several major theories of non-human centralism from the perspective of post-modernization dimensions,discloses the theory value and practical significance of the several dominating thoughts.

Heidegger is thought to be of anti-anthropocentrism, but what he really opposed is to show off new terms, to think of humanbeing as a subject of existence who could dominate and change existence arbitrarily, as well as the thi.

The contention on anthropocentrism and non anthropocentrism is a focal point of environmental ethics and both have its rationalities and limits.

Though the values of the traditional anthropocentrism can t suit the development of contemporary society,non anthropocentrism does not find the right value theory to solve the crises.