Postmodern legal methodology includes several important forms of legal mind such as Anti-foundationalism,deconstruction and neo-pragmatism which doubt objectivity and effectivity of legal knowledge and deny that there exist some universal criterions in legal system or law can be derived from some transcendent moral val.

The neo-pragmatism has prevailed in the American academic environment since 1960s,which not only made the pragmatism revive,also promoted the transformation of American knowledge view.

Richard Rotty,an outstanding figure of contemporary Western neo-pragmatism,establishes his philosophy upon his absolutely radical understanding of “contingencies,”i.

A Critical Analysis of Rorty′s Concept of Truth as Reflected in His New Pragmatism;

The basic theoretical framework of Rorty s philosophy consists of post philosophical culture, new pragmatism, racial centralism, free anti satirical theory, anti es.

As a reaction against the modern philosophy of science,which detached from the critique,history and practices of science,radical historicism and new pragmatism made the philosophy of science turn to the postmodern camp,constructed the postmodern image of science,which dissolved the rationality,empirical foundation and reality of science as well as scientific prestige in culture.

With respect to methods or theories,postmodern jurisprudence mainly draws lessons from deconstruction,genealogy and neopragmatism.

Richard Rorty suggests that we can use NeoPragmatism to imagine and reconstruct the classics.

He puts forward the conversational objectiveness of law based on new pragmatism philosophy, i.

Discusses the Dewey Pragmatism Education Thought and the Chinese Vocational Education Priefly;

Pragmatism and the Anti-terrorism Policy of the U.S.;

On the evolution and fundamental ideas of pragmatism;