On the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People s Court in China——Suspect legality of article 5 of FaFa(2007)No.12;

Challenge to the Judicial Interpretation of Accomplished and Attempted Crime of Robbery——Also on the Realistic Gain and Loss of Judicial Interpretation and its Appropriate Trend;

Discussions of the Construction of "Rule of Removing Illegal Confession" in Our Country——Take the suspicion to the judicial interpretation of Supreme Court as angle of view;

Study on the essence of judicial explanation of criminal law;

Comprehension of National Indemnification in Judicial Explanation;

The Supreme People s Court s the fourth judicial explanation of "other crime" about surrendering voluntarily expellees the same kind of crime,which violates the principle of legality and "expected possibility" theory in theory and is harm not only to the defendants self-correction,but also to the judicial efficiency and quality in practice.

The prejudication system is rational to some extent, which can overcome the limitations of judicial interpretations and make every case equal.

The two legal interpretations of the tasks of civil procurators in reopening a case issued by the Supreme Court and the Supreme People s Procuratorate are contradictory.

Implementation of the right for legal interpretation is of the feature characterized with power in focus: forced power, overriding power and collecting power.

During the course of the reconstruction, the main point is to relocate the statue and the function of the legislative interpretation and judiciary interpretation.

This requires the judge to show his initiatives and to avoid arbitrariness, and judiciary interpretation is the basic device and process keeping correct judgments.

Courts follow the inner logic of the law,and the judges give verdicts according to equality,justice and so on,thus making the judicial interpretations of Company Act full of difficult points and diversities.