When they belong to the transitive construction,the \'NP1+NP2\' chunk is a TopP,with NP1 as the topic and NP2 the comment;when they are ditransitive ones,NP1and NP2 are analyzed as two different objects,bearing the affectee and the patient thematic roles respectively.

The lexicalization of verb-object construction is the result of the autonomy of verb or object weakening.

The thesis mainly studies and explores the evolution conditions of verb-object constructions consisting of the above verbs from the perspectives of the verb-object framework,the components of objects and the semantic types of objects,and also conducts a case study on diachronic conditions of the ability of the verb "zuo(坐)"to carry a location objects.

Traditional grammar books claimed that verb-object construction cannot serve as transitive verbs, and cannot hold outer object.

The predicate-object structure is one of the most important structures in Chinese as a SOV language and reveals quite a few syntactical traits of the Chinese language with its rich usages.

Since in ancient Chinese, there are plenty of situations in which the adjectives are used as verbs, part of the side-centre structures seem to be the same as the verb-object structures.

Due to the mono-disyllabic selection of Chinese words,the verb-object structure in Chinese has four possible forms:(1+1),(1+2),(2+2) and(2+1),of which(2+1) is ungrammatical.

On Chinese Double-Object Construction and Binding Theory;

The conclusions are as follows : First , the constructions of "作·名1/ 之 ·名2 " and "为·名1/ 之 ·名2" can be considered to be both double-object construction and single-object construction , depending on the different meanings of verbs , "作" and "为".