1) On the Concept of Over-defense
防卫过当概念探微
2) excessive defense
防卫过当
1.
The present interpretation of self-defense and excessive defense can be summarized as follows: Self-defense and excessive defense can be discussed on the basis of self-defense.
现有的关于正当防卫和防卫过当的表述可以简单地概括为:以正当防卫为基础,讨论正当防卫和防卫过当的问题。
2.
Specially, theinterpretation of limited condition is the key difference betweenjustifiable and excessive defense.
防卫过当作为正当防卫制度中一个不可或缺的课题，历来受到理论界和实务界的普遍关注和重视。
3) Unjustifiable self-defense
防卫过当
1.
Unjustifiable self-defense is a special form of criminal offence.
防卫过当是一种特殊的犯罪形态,其犯罪构成要件与其他普通犯罪的构成要件有很大不同。
2.
The unjustifiable self-defense is an important supplement to the justifiable self-defense.
防卫过当制度是正当防卫制度的重要补充。
3.
Unjustifiable Self-defense is an important content of Justifiable Self-defense, of which the holdis difficult to solve.
防卫过当是正当防卫制度中的重要内容,防卫过当认定也是司法实践中的疑难问题之一。
4) over-defense
防卫过当
1.
The reason that over-defense defined by criminal law circles is unscientific is that the scholars have a misunderstanding towards the regulation for Article 2 of Item 20.
刑法学界对防卫过当的定义有失科学 ,这源于学者对我国刑法第 2 0条第二款规定的错误解读 ,该规定不是对防卫过当的定义 ,只是对其中构成犯罪的情形做了规定 ;正当防卫的防卫限度条件是“不得超过必要限度造成不应有的损害” ,而不是“不得明显超过必要限度造成重大损害” ;防卫过当既可以构成犯罪 ,也可以是一般违法行为 ,还可以成立意外事件 ,其主观上可以欠缺过错 ;防卫过当可以存在假想防卫中 ,成立假想防卫过
2.
The law of our country should make clear the relation between "apparently exceeding the limits of necessity" and "causing a serious harm" by the subjective guilty mind of the defender when the defender commits an over-defense.
我国应该从防卫人的主观罪过上区分成立防卫过当时"明显超过必要限度"与"造成重大损害"之间的关系。
3.
This paper distinguishes just defense from over-defense.
这就要求我们在实践中,厘清正当防卫与防卫过当两个既有本质区别又有密切联系的概念。
5) boundless defence
无过当防卫
1.
Over-defence and boundless defence are important parts of justifiable defence theory.
“防卫过当”和“无过当防卫”是正当防卫理论的重要组成部分 ,新刑法增加的“无过当防卫”内容 ,有利于鼓励人们进行正当防卫。
补充资料：防卫过当
防卫过当：指正当防卫明显超过必要限度,给不法侵害人造成重大伤害的行为。
说明：补充资料仅用于学习参考，请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条