Compare "another Person s Property" of Conversion between China and Japan;

But while Penal Code was revised in 1997, conversion was written in, in order to adapt the development of the society.

The crime of embezzlement is a crime which our country legal rule tells only then processes;this legislation stipulated itself has certain serious flaws.

When the party occupies others property in a large number and refuses to return, can the party be called to account according to the crime of embezzlement? This is a complicated problem that has been perplexing in the judicial circle of our country and law circles all the time since criminal law was revised in 1997.

The Difference Between Maintaining Crime of Occupation and Crime of Theft;

Crime of theft is similar with crime of occupation for the purpose of deliberately infringes upon the ownership of property.

It has great significance to know clearly about the objective characteristics of this crime for correctly recognizing the crime of occupation.

The Discussion about the Confusion of Embezzlement Judicial Cognizance——from the Perspective of the Case of LIANG Li in Shenzhen

It is many new types of dishonest conducts that made embezzlement emerge in English and American criminal law． Usually embezzlement is constituted by four elements： entrusted people； lawful possession； fraudulently； convert for lots of doctrines forming in criminal justice， the differences between embezzlement and larceny or false pretence are faint and tangled.

As the new accusation stipulated in 270th article of criminal law 1997, the crime of embezzlement do good to the performance in punishing the behavior of invading, promoting the development of economy, fully protecting the human rights in the condition of market-oriented economy, and protecting the property rights of all nature in every respects.