On Analysis of Objective Truth and Legal Truth;

The objective vs.legal truth by testimony criteria in criminal procedural law in China;

The concept of legal truth is a false one that is not tenable,and the proposition of the theory of legal.

Dworkin contends that coherence is the standard of testing legal truth;his theory tries to transcend the disagreement between the absolutism and the relativism.

Does truth exist in the law? Or does the legal truth exist? Which is a precondition in relation to the legal ground of the legal interpretations and judicial decisions.

But after the middle period of 20 century,with the separation idea breaking down,legal truth has been established.

The reform direction of proof standard in civil action should aim at the high degree probability which is based on legal reality, but should follow the operation rule of modern civil action.

For a long time past,there was in the theoretical circles a dispute between two evidence standards:"objective reality" and "legal reality".

However, under the circumstance that theory of legal reality is becoming more and more emphasized, much attention should be specially paid to the purchase of objective reality.

The arthor denies the “standard based on objective truth”doctrine and prove the “standard based on action truth and law truth”doctrine.

The author also makes an analysis on the standards of objective authenticity, legal authenticity and substantial authenticity under value orientations in litigant practice.