说明:双击或选中下面任意单词,将显示该词的音标、读音、翻译等;选中中文或多个词,将显示翻译。
您的位置:首页 -> 词典 -> 形式正义与实质正义
1)  form justice and real justice
形式正义与实质正义
1.
What is this dispute s essence? How to eliminate misunderstanding and coordinate with the difference? How to grasp the essence of the Individual Penalty Theory and make our choice in criminal law? This paper will put Individual Penalty Theory into form justice and real justice, legislative power and judicial power, and the costs and benefits framework and fo.
大家争议的实质何在?如何消除误会与协调观点差异?如何把握刑罚个别化的真实蕴涵及其取舍?为了解决上述问题,本文将刑罚个别化理论放在了形式正义与实质正义、立法权与司法权、成本与收益三个框架中进行了分析,并得出了自己的结论。
2)  Substantive Justice
实质正义
1.
Formal justice and substantive justice are the values of rights and obligation distribution in modern and contemporary law respectively.
形式正义和实质正义分别属于近代和现代法律分配权利和义务的价值观念。
2.
We compare the value of Economic Law with that of Law, Civil Law and Administrative Law in order to find that the value orientation of Economic Law is pursue substantive justice, social benefit and harmony of economic freedom and order.
价值是法律科学的基本范畴之一,将经济法的价值与一般意义的法以及邻近法律部门,主要是民法和行政法的价值进行比较,从而进一步论证以实质正义、社会效益、经济自由与经济秩序和谐为其独特价值取向的经济法具有独立法律部门的地位和独特的存在价值及意义。
3.
In the postmetaphysical society, the criteria of substantive justice are challenged because of the ruin of the traditional metaphysics, which is the starting point of reflection on justice.
哈贝马斯提出的话语理论的正义观只关注正义的形式,而不涉及到正义的实质内容,更不涉及实质正义的标准。
3)  Substantial justice
实质正义
1.
Protecting disadvantageous persons has become one of the trends in legislation in private international law,which reflects that the aim the private international law pursues has transferred from "formal justice" to "substantial justice".
保护弱者权益已成为国际私法立法所追求的基本理念之一,体现了国际私法所追求的价值目标从"形式正义"向"实质正义"的转变。
2.
In this article, the author tries to analyze the substantial justice, social efficiency, economic security and balance of economic law to indicate the value difference between economic law and civil law.
从经济法的实质正义、社会效益、经济安全和平衡协调的价值着眼 ,说明经济法存在的必要
3.
Despite the different situations, the substantial justice of tax law demands the formulation and implementation of tax law should have adequate consideration of the difference in tax payers income level, social status and their financial burden.
而税法的实质正义,是指税收的制定与实施充分考虑到纳税人的经济与社会地位及家庭经济负担的情况,对不同情况的纳税人区别对待,追求结果的公平。
4)  essential justice
实质正义
1.
The way of thinking of Chinese traditional judicatory activity,whose best entitative character is based on the pursuing a idea of harmonious and non-lawsuit,emphasizing essential justice and making concessions to avoid trouble,brings up a agriculture nation with vast of population and a harmonious peaceful life.
中国传统司法活动中的思维方式,最本质的特征就是基于对和谐、无讼的理想追求,强调实质正义和息事宁人,虽然在某种程度上牺牲了法律的形式正义,但此种思维方式却也造就了泱泱人口的农业大国和谐而宁静的生活,并且此种思维方式在现代司法实践中仍大量存在,并对和谐社会的构建起着维护作用。
2.
The value orientation of this law system lies in its essential justice and process justice and thus,with the entity factor being in nuclear position and the process factor in auxiliary position.
英美法系犯罪构成的价值取向乃实质正义与程序正义,因此实体要件处于辅助地位,程序要件处于核心地位。
5)  real justice
实质正义
1.
This article is based on the restorative justice,and persues the aim of protection of victims rights which connect the real justice.
以恢复性司法为制度进路,追求刑事被害人权利保护这一事关实质正义实现的法治目标。
6)  material justice
实质正义
1.
The value orientation of international private law has changed from conflict justice to material justice,which includes the application of the principle of closest relationship,the emphasis on the protection of individual interests and the realization of the material justice in judicial practice.
国际私法的价值取向经历了由冲突正义向实质正义的变迁,具体表现在:引入了最密切联系原则;更加重视对私人利益的保护;在司法实践中更注重实质正义的实现,更好地保护当事人的利益。
2.
Conflict law does not mean to pursue conflict justice only and thus disregards material justice.
冲突法并非仅仅追求冲突正义而不关注实质正义。
3.
The material justice is the only choice.
既不能以实体的正义作为参照去评判程序的正义 ,也不能以程序的正义作为基准去决定实体的正义 ,实质正义才是唯一的选择。
补充资料:正义
正义
justice
    伦理学、政治学的基本范畴。在伦理学中,通常指人们
按一定道德标准所应当作的事,也指一种道德评价,即公正。“正义”一词,在中国最早见于《荀子》:“不学问,无正义,以富利为隆,是俗人者也。”正义观念萌于原始人的平等观,形成于私有财产出现后的社会。不同的社会或阶级的人们对“正义”有着不同的解释:古希腊哲学家柏拉图认为,人们按自己的等级做应当做的事就是正义;基督教伦理学家则认为,肉体应当归顺于灵魂就是正义。马克思主义伦理学认为,正义与否的客观标准主要在于其行为是否符合社会发展的要求与广大群众的利益。
说明:补充资料仅用于学习参考,请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条