On that basis, through summing up the legislative intentions and primary characteristics behind these two standards, analyzing and comparing the common ground and the differences between them, a conclusion has been educed, that is, the evidence standard of prosecution adopted by a country correlates closely with this country s procedure model and legal culture tradition, even more determined .

With the reform of public prosecutor system,it is essential to establish the standards of criminal evidence.

On the one hand,evidence criteria of public persecution are not an independent issue in theory;on the other hand,evidence criteria of public persecution in China and foreign countries are not in a common line of good or bad,and all of them obeys the logic of the legality and effectiveness of the right of public persecution.

In the theories of evidence law,the standard of prosecution is a kind and level of the standards of proof in the criminal procedure.

Suspects and the truth of crime in this kind of case can be easily found out,so we should put the emphasis on the following two aspects: firstly,evidence standard should be determined to set the aim of detection and evidence collection according to the rules of criminal law on infringement of business secret;secondly.

The determination and function of the rule of evidence must be inspected by the standard of evidence.