The court system reform is one of the crucial parts in the judicial system reform,and is also the most historical phase during the modern course of court system which is originated from the Qing dynasty.

Both Germany and the United Sates belong to federal governments and both of them pursue the doctrine that " the constitution has the supreme effect" and, therefore, their court systems have to submit to the relevant characteristics.

The administrativity of the judicial system has caused so many malpractices that it offers possibility for the executive to interfere with the judicial, that the justice’s ind.

The organization of current judicial system and the administrative phenomena in operation are the key factors that hinder further judicial reform.

Three aspects are compared and contrasted in this paper,including historical development,legislation systems and vocational education laws for the purpose of identifying the differences between history and reality,culture and systems of the two countries.

China s legislation system has a character of "one element, two levels, multi structure .

Its constitutional provisions and practices decide the dual legislation systems between federation and states.

What determines a countrys legislative system is its form of govemment and form of state structure.