1) financial investment in public education
公共教育财政投入
1.
With a comparison and analysis of the features of the financial investment in public education during the period of rapid economic growth,it can be found that the financial investment in public education in China is smaller than that in Japan,and that the amount of public finance for education cannot meet the needs of the national education.
我国应以日本为鉴,在未来的经济社会发展中,加大公共教育财政投入,加强教育财政的体制和法制建设。
2) public finance input
公共财政投入
1.
The author adopts the actual data of our country and proves vir co-integration analysis and Granger causality test that the scarcity of public finance input is the important reason for the excessively low consumption level of residents in our country.
笔者采用我国实际数据,通过协整分析和Granger因果检验,证明公共财政投入不足是我国居民消费水平过低的重要原因。
3) financial education investment
财政教育投入
1.
In China,the root cause of education unfairness is that the reform of our financial education investment system lags behind that of economic system.
从我国的现实情况来看,教育不公最根本的原因是我国财政教育投入体制的改革滞后于经济体制改革,具体可以从财政教育投入的总量不足和结构不合理两方面进行分析。
6) public educational finance
公共教育财政
1.
As we have theoretically analyzed,government is the main body of educational resource distribution and public educational finance investment should not only pursue the efficiency,but also attach importance to the equity.
政府是教育资源配置的重要主体,公共教育财政投入既要求追求效率,又要注重公平。
补充资料：公共财政
公共财政指的是仅为市场经济提供公共服务的政府分配行为，它是国家财政的一种具体存在形态，即与市场经济相适应的财政类型。
研究政府收支预算的经济学门类。政府是经济活动的主体之一，马斯格雷夫认为政府的主要作用有三个方面：（1）提供公共物品、提供资源配置过程中%26ldquo;市场失灵%26rdquo;的矫正手段；（2）调节收入分配以在社会成员中求得达成公平的社会产出分配；（3）在适当稳定的价格水平下运用凯恩斯政策求得较高水平的就业率。以上三项作用可以归结为配置功能、分配功能和稳定功能。布坎南则着重指出了政府%26ldquo;失灵%26rdquo;及其对社会的危害。
说明：补充资料仅用于学习参考，请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条