There are two kinds of theory in civil-law countries, for example, objectivism, subjectivism.

We should keep the rationality of formulation while interpreting the criminal law,we should adopt subjectivism more than objectivism.

There are mainly three arguments regarding to the aim of the criminal law interpretation in the criminal academic circles: the theory of subjectiveness,the theory of objectiveness and that of eclect.

All the goals explained by the theories in the interpretations to criminal law,such as the theory of subjectiveness,the theory of objectiveness and the theory of eclecticism have their defects which impair the function of criminal law to safeguard human rights.

According to the respective nature, characteristics and the status quo of ruling by law, the goal of legislative interpretation shall choose "the theory of objectiveness" and the goal of judicial interpretation shall choose "the theory of compromise" so that the law can serve the needs of the society better.

There are the modified objective danger theory and the abstract danger theory in determining the danger of impossibility in our criminal law theory.

The eventual reconciliation between the Legal Truth Doctrine and the Objective Truth Doctrine demonstrates that the two elements actually coexist and complement rather than conflict with each other.