1) Paradoxes of Implication
蕴涵怪论
1.
Lack of relevance may lead to certain types of paradoxes of implication though is not the cause of other types thereof.
“蕴涵怪论”产生于命题逻辑而非谓词逻辑的层面上,相干性的缺失导致某些“蕴涵怪论”的产生, 却不是另一些“蕴涵怪论”生成的原因。
2) paradox of material implication
实质蕴涵怪论
1.
The so-called paradox of material implication is not actually that odd since it is caused by some kind of misunderstanding when people require material implication expressions not only the truth properties but contents and meanings as well in conditions.
实质蕴涵与否定、合取、析取、等值等其他逻辑联结词一样,其实质是对自然语言中复句的关联词所进行的合理的逻辑抽象,所谓的“实质蕴涵怪论”其实并不怪,它是人们要求实质蕴涵反映条件联系中除真假联系之外的内容、意义方面的联系,从而作了错误的解读所造成的;作为一种特殊的条件语句,在反事实条件句与实质蕴涵的关系问题上,在反事实条件句与一般性条件句的区分上,还有很多地方需要进一步探索。
3) theoretical implication
理论蕴涵
1.
There are different theoretical implications for zoology compensation in different subjects.
在不同学科的研究视野中,生态补偿有着不同的理论蕴涵。
4) Reflections on Entailment
浅论蕴涵
5) paradoxes of strict implication
严格蕴涵悖论
6) On Implications
蕴涵理论研究
补充资料：怪论
1.奇怪的论调。
说明：补充资料仅用于学习参考，请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条