1) Chinese and foreign criminal retrial
中外刑事再审
1.
In view of the comparison between Chinese and foreign criminal retrial system such as applying subject,applying cause,due process of law;applying acts,applying time and frequency,the principles of changing the original sentence,we use the value in the institutional design of other countries for reference to unify substantial authenticity and due process of law in retrial procedure.
中外刑事再审制度在发起主体、发起理由、管辖方式、发起时限及次数和改判原则上存在差异。
2) criminal retrial
刑事再审
1.
Efficiency analysis of criminal retrial procedure;
刑事再审程序的效益分析
2.
This article makes a brief comparison on the foreign criminal retrial procedures,and analyzes present situation of criminal retrial procedure in China,then provides some basic ideas to reconstruction of criminal retrial procedure in our country.
刑事再审程序作为刑事审判错误的一种矫正机制,其设计的科学与否直接关系到刑事审判的质量与公正。
3.
China should establish this principle in the mode of relatively no punishment of aggravation as early as possible in criminal retrial system.
“再审不加刑”维护了判决的既判力和权威性,有利于保障刑事被告的基本权利和实现诉讼效益的最大化,我国刑事再审程序应以相对不加刑模式尽快确立此原则。
3) the criminal supervision proceedings of China
中国刑事再审程序
4) power of criminal retrial
刑事再审权
5) Reason for criminal retrial
刑事再审事由
6) The initiation of criminal retrial procedure
刑事再审启动权
补充资料：人民法院由提审和再审的权力
人民法院由提审和再审的权力：最高人民法院对地方各级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定，上级人民法院对下级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决和裁定，发现确有错误的，有权提审或者指令下一及人民法院再审。――――《中华人民共和国》第177条。
说明：补充资料仅用于学习参考，请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条