Reconsideration on function of theory of juristic act of real right;

What is so-called juristic act of real right? Since German scholar Friedrich Carl von Savigny created juristic act of real right theory,this question has always been argued unceasingly by schools.

The juristic acts of real rights are based on unreason principle and independence principle.

As an important concept in real laws of German Civil Law and some country s real laws in-flucnced by it, juristic acts of real rights means legal acts in the purpose of real rights change.

There has already been a lot of controversy and criticism in the extent of civil law all over the world since the theory of juristic acts of real rights birth.

The real right behavior theory has been causing argument in the various countries of the world since it is established by Saiweni,about whether it should be living or dying,there is two viewpoints.

The pattern of real right changes,the definition and characteristic as well as efficacy of real right behavior have long been the argue points of Civil Law s Academic.

The feasibility of the theory of property act in China;

Whether to acknowledge and adopt the property act theory is a fundamental technical problem to solve in property act legislation and civil legislation.

The paper explores the connotation of property act from legal behavior theory and holds that property independently constitutes property act, whereas payment and registration do not.

As Savigny, founder of the theory on juristic act of right in rem, failing to make clear in concept contributes to a heated debate for a long time, the objects, the parties, the declaration of will and substantive requirements of the act are expounded.