1) A Study of Crime of Seizing
抢夺罪研究
2) Study on the Crime of Seizing
抢夺罪之研究
3) the crime of seizing
抢夺罪
1.
Question on the rationality of the crime of seizing——from the view of the motorist snatchings;
抢夺罪合理性质疑——以飞车抢夺为视角
2.
This article comparatively analyses the definition, the legislative pattern and the character of the constitution of the crime of seizing between Mainland and Taiwan.
本文从抢夺罪的定义、立法体例、犯罪构成特征、对携带凶器进行抢夺的行为定性等方面对海峡两岸有关抢夺罪的法律问题进行比较分析,指出其相同点和差异,并对有关的刑法规定提出了一些看法。
4) crime of seizing
抢夺罪
1.
The crime of seizing is not established merely according to whether the sufferer is being attacked all of a sudden without any time for resistance,and the relatively large amount in the crime of seizing refers to two aspects——subjective viciousness and objective detriment.
抢夺罪的成立不以客观上乘人不备实施为前提;抢夺罪中的“数额较大”包含主观恶性和客观危害两个方面,而非纯粹客观评价要素。
5) Robberies
[英]['rɔbəri] [美]['rɑbərɪ]
抢夺犯罪
1.
Characteristics and Interrogation Countermeasures against Robberies;
日益增多的抢夺犯罪严重影响了人民群众的安全感,加强对抢夺案件犯罪嫌疑人的讯问,深挖犯罪,遏止抢夺犯罪的上升势头是公安机关的任务之一。
补充资料：抢夺罪
抢夺罪：指以非法占有为目的，乘人不备，公开夺取数额较大的公私财物的行为。
说明：补充资料仅用于学习参考，请勿用于其它任何用途。
参考词条