If the judicial interpretation on security obligation is applied to legal practice,security of internet banking can be resolved in a better way,which can also balance the .

We should analyse specifically the responsibility division of the third party inftingement in the operating adctivity: some are specified clearly in the contract; some are not specified in the contract but the operator s misdeed may constitute the infringement responsibility by breaching the security obligation.

The existence of security obligation has played an important role in protecting victim s body and property for its special function.

The production of the safety-guard duty of ISP to the virtual property intertwines with the specified technical conditions of the generation and operation of the virtual property and the dependence of the virtual property on the specified network platform.

When the third person conducts a trotious act,the provision of the safety-guard obligor s complementary liability disobeys the fundamental spirit of the tort law,goes against the practice of the advanced countries and can t conform to the original intention of establishing the safety-guard duty.

And at the same time,it cannot conform to the original intention of establishing the safety-guard duty and goes against the practice of the advanced countries.

The operators are liable for damage and compensation if they fail to perform safeguard obligation resulting in the injury of tourists.

To protect victims personal and property rights and interests, all countries have established the safeguard obligations according to the honesty credit principle while considering the social development and moral requests.

With the prompt development of economy and society, two kinds of cases about of safeguard obligation happened frequently.