It is the dutiful historical commitment for all the peace-loving people to expose and denounce the war crimes committed by Yasukuni Shrine to enshrining the Class-A war criminals,to reiterate the legitimacy and justice of Tokyo Trial and to oppose the Japanese politicians′ formulaic visit.

National legislation should provide necessary punishment basis for war crime in internal armed conflict.

The war crimes occurred in non-international armed conflict should be punished by the domestic models,and it should be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the domestic military judiciary,and corresponding .

The revive of natural law puts forward the theory of punishing war crime,and new natural law promotes the perfection of internation- al humanitarian law.

On the Connotation of War Crime and the Subject of Criminal Responsibility;

War crimes are mainly subject to international law,but domestic courts also bear the responsibility to punish perpetrators of war crimes.

How could we carry on the punishment to the war criminal and reduce the war eruption? It is necessary to point out that the legal science domain must pay high attention to the research of the war crime, especially to the constitution of the war crime.

A general survey of the war crimes committed by the Japanese soldiers in Northeast China;

The Tokyo tribunal held 28 A-class Japanese criminals including Tojo guilty in that their acts in and prior to the war constitute the crime against peace, conventional war crimes and the crime against humanity.