To use administrative discretion correctly,we need not only the control via law,but also to establish some moral boundary.

The paper elaborates from the ethical point of view the significant value of social equity for the administrative discretion.

However, discrepancies arising from interpretation of the concepts and rational standard of administrative discretion are far from ended.

The Interest Representative Model of administrative law and the control over administrative discretion;

How to Exercise the Right of the Administrative Discretion

With the development of modern society and the pursuit of the modernity of public administration,the rationality value and limitation of the administrative jurisdiction is standing out.

The aim of the exertion of administrative jurisdiction should be to ensure justice, which, however, cannot always be guaranteed nowadays because of some reasons.

The applicable means of the administrative jurisdiction can be various, while the principles are required to carry it out properly.

How to control the administrative discretionary power is an important problem in the administration process in accordance with law.

That administrative discretionary power also increases is the most clear evidence.

And last raises the suggestion of correctly exercising administrative discretionary power.

As an important part of executive power,discretion in administration plays a special role in administrative activities.

It is judicial supervision, as jurisdiction to modify administrative acts in our country, that can supervise discretion in administration most powerfully and effectively.

As one of the important parts in administrative power, discretion in administration has a certain theoretical, legal and social basis, which, however, breaks down in reasonable exertion.

In order to protect and preserve the rule of law, the court makes it as its sanctary responsibility to review the administrative discretional acts.