By comparing the sameness and difference of resolving systems of environmental disputes between China and South Korea,some good experience from which will enhance our building environmental legal system.

Alternative Dispute Resolution of environmental dispute has been used in U.

With the deteriorated pollution situation in China,the number of environmental disputes is increasing year by year at a high speed.

Administrative disposal is important to the settlement of environmental disputes.

With more and more environmental disputes being sued for the courts, the limited judicial resources have hardly supported such lawsuits.

The traditional litigation system is inadequate to settle the environmental disputes and can’t meet the developing practical needs.

But because of the all kinds reason, the lawmaking and judicial present condition,the environment dispute give relief the path far and not smooth, judicatory the depth to get involvedto environment dispute and wide degree all treat in further promote.

China has more and more environment disputes,however,environment litigation does not realize the function of protecting social justice,promoting environment protection and promoting environment legislation.

Administration system of environment dispute has good prospect and great developing space.

The paper summarized the importance of environmental monitoring data in environmental pollution lawsuit,and analyzed the characteristics of the data and the basic conditions of the data to be of force adeffect,and discussed the factors influencing force adeffect and the route to improve the force adeffect of the data.